According to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), as of today, more than 121,000 people are on a waiting list for a life saving transplant. In addition, they say on average, 22 people die each day while waiting for a transplant.
A recent study in JAMA Surgery by researchers from the University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville and others reveal that compensation for a living kidney donor would increase the chances of donation.
Read the abstract:
Importance Patients in the United States waiting for kidney transplantation die in increasing numbers owing to the severe kidney shortage, which might be alleviated by compensating living kidney donors.
Objective To determine the willingness of voting US citizens to become living kidney donors and to ascertain the potential influence of compensation for donation.
Design, Setting, and Participants A professionally designed quantitative survey was administered by an international polling firm in June 2014. Information was collected on willingness to donate a kidney and the potential influence of compensation ($50 000); survey data included respondent age, income, education level, sex, US region, race/ethnicity, marital status, political affiliation, likelihood to vote, and employment status. The survey was performed via a random-digit dialing process that selected respondents via both landlines and mobile telephones to improve population representation. The survey included 1011 registered US voters likely to vote.
Main Outcomes and Measures The degree to which the US voting public is willing to donate a kidney and the perceptions of current voters toward paying living kidney donors.
Results Of the 1011 respondents, 427 were male and 584 were female, with 43% of participants between ages 45 and 64 years. With respondents grouped by willingness to donate, we found that 689 (68%) would donate a kidney to anyone and 235 (23%) only to certain persons; 87 (9%) would not donate. Most (59%) indicated that payment of $50 000 would make them even more likely to donate a kidney, 32% were unmoved by compensation, and 9% were negatively influenced by payment.
Conclusions and Relevance Most US voters view living kidney donation positively, and most would be motivated toward donor nephrectomy if offered a payment of $50 000. Because most registered voters favor such payments, and because thousands of lives might be saved should compensation increase the number of transplantable kidneys, laws and regulations prohibiting donor compensation should be modified to allow pilot studies of financial incentives for living kidney donors. Outcomes of such trials could then result in evidence-based policies, which would incorporate fair and just compensation to those persons willing to undergo donor nephrectomy.