Every now and then I come across a article published on the “professional” social media platform, LinkedIn, that seems like a good fit for this website.
So I’ll contact the author for permission to publish, or syndicate it on outbreaknewstoday.com.
Image/OpenClipart-Vectors
On Saturday, a post on antibiotics and antibiotic stewardship caught my eye as I skimmed the beginning of the piece.
I contacted the author, a man with at least six degrees (1 undergraduate, 6 graduate including a PhD and working on a 7th) for permission, which was granted.
I chose to keep his identity anonymous.
Here is the LinkedIn thread describing the conversation:
Robert Herriman
Hi Dr XXXX,
I enjoyed your recent article on antibiotics very much. I would like permission to “syndicate” that post on my website, outbreaknewstoday.com
Thanks for your consideration, Robert
LinkedIn Member
Hi Robert Have at it.
Robert Herriman sent the following message at 7:50 PM
Thanks
LinkedIn Member sent the following message at 8:11 PM
Keep me posted
So far, so good. However, upon closer look at the content, I found a couple of things that I found problematic and couldn’t publish. This included calling Vancomycin an aminoglycoside and saying aminoglycosides were “Another group of β-lactam antibiotics”.
So I contacted the individual and so the thread continues:
Robert Herriman
While editing, I found a couple of issues, is it ok if I edit?
1. Vancomycin is included with the aminoglycosides
2. Aminoglycosides are called Beta lactams
LinkedIn Member
Maybe you better just forget the whole thing. I don’t like having my work edited
Especially when it’s already correct. I’m sure you understand
Robert Herriman
Thanks
I get it, no one wants their work edited so I figured that was the end of it and moved on–no harm, no foul.
Until early Sunday morning when the issued resurfaced. I woke up to this inquiry:
LinkedIn Member
Where did you obtain the information that my article was incorrect? I am understandably curious.
Robert Herriman
Just years of experience as a microbiologist. I know vancomycin is a glycopeptide and I know aminoglycosides are not beta lactams, but are frequently used in combo with beta lactams. I’m sure this info is available in common texts and online.
Drum roll…..this is how the PhD replied:
LinkedIn Member
If you say so. But I have significantly greater education in this area as well as experience so I would suggest you write your own articles and see how that goes OK?
As I was trying reply back to him that it was not personal and was sorry he felt it was, I noticed the replies kept on failing.
Lo and behold, the magnificent scientist with more letters after his name than I have fingers and toes, blocked me–hence him suddenly appearing as LinkedIn Member.
Very bizarre situation to say the least. Do we really need to act so childish? Must his ego become bruised so easily?
It’s a shame that colleagues in health and medicine blogging have to act that way. I have people correcting things on the website occasionally.
Anyway, I thought I’d share this weird situation. What are your thoughts?
2 thoughts on “My strange experience with a LinkedIn member this weekend: Childish behavior and a bruised ego?”
Pingback: My strange experience with a LinkedIn member this weekend: Childish behavior and a bruised ego? – SocialNews
Hi
I am sorry but the way you processed could only lead to that.
You ask to someone who doesn’t know you for something for free, you critic the article by talking about a “couple of issues” and take liberty to edit his work…
Next time, just politely ask “May I ask you a question regarding your article ? I thought X and Y were … But it doesn’t seem the case in your article, would you mind giving me more insights / source ? Thanks a lot”
It’s like you lend your car to a friend for free, he brought the car with a new paint color and told you after that it’s better this way.
And after you write an article saying that the friend who lend you the car is childish because he didn’t thank you for the free paint.
I am not sure who is the most childish in this story
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Hi
I am sorry but the way you processed could only lead to that.
You ask to someone who doesn’t know you for something for free, you critic the article by talking about a “couple of issues” and take liberty to edit his work…
Next time, just politely ask “May I ask you a question regarding your article ? I thought X and Y were … But it doesn’t seem the case in your article, would you mind giving me more insights / source ? Thanks a lot”
It’s like you lend your car to a friend for free, he brought the car with a new paint color and told you after that it’s better this way.
And after you write an article saying that the friend who lend you the car is childish because he didn’t thank you for the free paint.
I am not sure who is the most childish in this story
Have a good day